HR 2868

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to extend, modify, and recodify the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to enhance security and protect against acts of terrorism against chemical facilities, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Bennie G. Thompson (D) MS
 
Status: Passed
 
Govit Voted No 100%
S600400M
Gov Voted No 46%
S600400G
 
 
 
 
 
Details
 
 
Take Action:
 
 
 
 
link
 
 
Summary:
6/15/2009--Introduced.Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009 - Amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to set forth provisions governing the regulation of security practices at chemical facilities. Authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate any chemical substance as a substance of concern and establish the threshold quantity for each such substance after considering the potential extent of death, injury, and serious adverse effects that could result from a chemical facility terrorist incident. Directs the Secretary to: (1) maintain a list of covered chemical facilities that are of sufficient security risk; (2) assign each covered facility to one of four risk-based tiers; (3) establish standards and procedures for security vulnerability assessments and site security plans; (4) require each facility owner or operator to submit and, once approved, to implement such an assessment and plan; and (5) establish risk-based chemical security performance standards for site security plans. Permits the Secretary, under specified circumstances, to: (1) accept an alternate security program submitted by the owner or operator of the facility; (2) conduct facility security inspections; and (3) obtain access to and copy records. Requires: (1) the timely sharing of threat information; and (2) the Secretary to provide information to the public regarding a process by which individuals may report problems, deficiencies, or vulnerabilities at a covered facility associated with the risk of a terrorist incident. Establishes whistleblower protections for facility employees who report violations. Establishes in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) an Office of Chemical Facility Security. Authorizes civil actions by individuals alleging violations of this Act.
 
Text of Legislation:

HR 2868 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2868

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to extend, modify, and recodify the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to enhance security and protect against acts of terrorism against chemical facilities, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 15, 2009

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts, Ms. CLARKE, and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned


A BILL

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to extend, modify, and recodify the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to enhance security and protect against acts of terrorism against chemical facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ‘Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings:

      (1) The Nation’s chemical sector represents a target that terrorists could exploit to cause consequences, including death, injury, or serious adverse effects to human health, the environment, critical infrastructure, public health, homeland security, national security, and the national economy.

      (2) Chemical facilities that pose such potential consequences and that are vulnerable to terrorist attacks must be protected.

      (3) The Secretary of Homeland Security has statutory authority pursuant to section 550 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 109-295) to regulate the security practices at chemical facilities that are at significant risk of being terrorist targets.

      (4) The Secretary of Homeland Security issued interim final regulations called the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards, which became effective on June 8, 2007.

    (b) Purpose- The purpose of this Act is to modify and make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to regulate security practices at chemical facilities.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION, MODIFICATION, AND RECODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO REGULATE SECURITY PRACTICES AT CHEMICAL FACILITIES.

    (a) In General- The Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new title:

‘TITLE XXI--REGULATION OF SECURITY PRACTICES AT CHEMICAL FACILITIES

‘SEC. 2101. DEFINITIONS.

    ‘In this title, the following definitions apply:

      ‘(1) The term ‘chemical facility’ means any facility--

        ‘(A) at which the owner or operator of the facility possesses or plans to possess at any relevant point in time a substance of concern; or

        ‘(B) that meets other risk-related criteria identified by the Secretary.

      ‘(2) The term ‘chemical facility security performance standards’ means risk-based standards established by the Secretary to ensure or enhance the security of a chemical facility against a chemical facility terrorist incident that are designed to address the following:

        ‘(A) Restricting the area perimeter.

        ‘(B) Securing site assets.

        ‘(C) Screening and controlling access to the facility and to restricted areas within the facility by screening or inspecting individuals and vehicles as they enter, including--

          ‘(i) measures to deter the unauthorized introduction of dangerous substances and devices that may facilitate a chemical facility terrorist incident or actions having serious negative consequences for the population surrounding the chemical facility; and

          ‘(ii) measures implementing a regularly updated identification system that checks the identification of chemical facility personnel and other persons seeking access to the chemical facility and that discourages abuse through established disciplinary measures.

        ‘(D) Methods to deter, detect, and delay a chemical facility terrorist incident, creating sufficient time between detection of a chemical facility terrorist incident and the point at which the chemical facility terrorist incident becomes successful, including measures to--

          ‘(i) deter vehicles from penetrating the chemical facility perimeter, gaining unauthorized access to restricted areas, or otherwise presenting a hazard to potentially critical targets;

          ‘(ii) deter chemical facility terrorist incidents through visible, professional, well-maintained security measures and systems, including security personnel, detection systems, barriers and barricades, and hardened or reduced value targets;

          ‘(iii) detect chemical facility terrorist incidents at early stages through counter surveillance, frustration of opportunity to observe potential targets, surveillance and sensing systems, and barriers and barricades; and

          ‘(iv) delay a chemical facility terrorist incident for a sufficient period of time so as to allow appropriate response through on-site security response, barriers and barricades, hardened targets, and well-coordinated response planning.

        ‘(E) Securing and monitoring the shipping, receipt, and storage of a substance of concern for the chemical facility.

        ‘(F) Deterring theft or diversion of a substance of concern.

        ‘(G) Deterring insider sabotage.

        ‘(H) Deterring cyber sabotage, including by preventing unauthorized onsite or remote access to critical process controls, including supervisory control and data acquisition systems, distributed control systems, process control systems, industrial control systems, critical business systems, and other sensitive computerized systems.

        ‘(I) Developing and exercising an internal emergency plan for owners, operators, and covered individuals of a covered chemical facility for responding to chemical facility terrorist incidents at the facility. Any such plan shall include the provision of appropriate information to any local emergency planning committee, local law enforcement officials, and emergency response providers to ensure an effective, collective response to terrorist incidents.

        ‘(J) Maintaining effective monitoring, communications, and warning systems, including--

          ‘(i) measures designed to ensure that security systems and equipment are in good working order and inspected, tested, calibrated, and otherwise maintained;

          ‘(ii) measures designed to regularly test security systems, note deficiencies, correct for detected deficiencies, and record results so that they are available for inspection by the Department; and

          ‘(iii) measures to allow the chemical facility to promptly identify and respond to security system and equipment failures or malfunctions.

        ‘(K) Ensuring mandatory annual security training, exercises, and drills of chemical facility personnel appropriate to their roles, responsibilities, and access to chemicals, including participation by local law enforcement, local emergency response providers, appropriate supervisory and non-supervisory facility employees and their employee representatives, if any.

        ‘(L) Performing personnel surety for individuals with access to restricted areas or critical assets by conducting appropriate background checks and ensuring appropriate credentials for unescorted visitors and chemical facility personnel, including permanent and part-time personnel, temporary personnel, and contract personnel, including--

          ‘(i) measures designed to verify and validate identity;

          ‘(ii) measures designed to check criminal history;

          ‘(iii) measures designed to verify and validate legal authorization to work; and

          ‘(iv) measures designed to identify people with terrorist ties.

        ‘(M) Escalating the level of protective measures for periods of elevated threat.

        ‘(N) Specific threats, vulnerabilities, or risks identified by the Secretary for that chemical facility.

        ‘(O) Reporting of significant security incidents to the Department and to appropriate local law enforcement officials.

        ‘(P) Identifying, investigating, reporting, and maintaining records of significant security incidents and suspicious activities in or near the site.

        ‘(Q) Establishing one or more officials and an organization responsible for--

          ‘(i) security;

          ‘(ii) compliance with the standards under this paragraph;

          ‘(iii) serving as the point of contact for incident management purposes with Federal, State, local, and tribal agencies, law enforcement, and emergency response providers; and

          ‘(iv) coordination with Federal, State, local, and tribal agencies, law enforcement, and emergency response providers regarding plans and security measures for the collective response to a chemical facility terrorist incident.

        ‘(R) Maintaining appropriate records relating to the security of the facility, including a copy of the most recent security vulnerability assessment and site security plan at the chemical facility.

        ‘(S) Assessing and, as appropriate, utilizing methods to reduce the consequences of a terrorist attack.

        ‘(T) Methods to recover or mitigate the release of a substance of concern in the event of a chemical facility terrorist incident.

        ‘(U) Any additional security performance standards the Secretary may specify.

      ‘(3) The term ‘chemical facility terrorist incident’ means any act or attempted act of terrorism or terrorist activity committed at, near, or against a chemical facility, including--

        ‘(A) the release of a substance of concern from a chemical facility;

        ‘(B) the theft, misappropriation, or misuse of a substance of concern from a chemical facility; or

        ‘(C) the sabotage of a chemical facility or a substance of concern at a chemical facility.

      ‘(4) The term ‘employee representative’ means the representative of the certified or recognized bargaining agent engaged in a collective bargaining relationship with a private or public owner or operator of a chemical facility.

      ‘(5) The term ‘covered individual’ means a permanent, temporary, full-time, or part-time employee of a covered chemical facility or an employee of an entity with which the covered chemical facility has entered into a contract who is performing responsibilities at the facility pursuant to the contract.

      ‘(6) The term ‘covered chemical facility’ means a chemical facility that meets the criteria of section 2102(b)(1).

      ‘(7) The term ‘environment’ means--

        ‘(A) the navigable waters, the waters of the contiguous zone, and the ocean waters of which the natural resources are under the exclusive management authority of the United States under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.); and

        ‘(B) any other surface water, ground water, drinking water supply, land surface or subsurface strata, or ambient air within the United States or under the jurisdiction of the United States.

      ‘(8) The term ‘owner or operator’ with respect to a facility means any of the following:

        ‘(A) The person who owns the facility.

        ‘(B) The person who has responsibility for daily operation of the facility.

        ‘(C) The person who leases the facility.

      ‘(9) The term ‘person’ means an individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, corporation (including a government corporation), partnership, association, State, municipality, commission, political subdivision of a State, or any interstate body and shall include each department, agency, and instrumentality of the United States.

      ‘(10) The term ‘release’ means any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment (including the abandonment or discarding of barrels, containers, and other closed receptacles containing any hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant), but excludes (A) any release which results in exposure to persons solely within a workplace, with respect to a claim which such persons may assert against the employer of such persons, (B) emissions from the engine exhaust of a motor vehicle, rolling stock, aircraft, vessel, or pipeline pumping station engine, (C) release of source, byproduct, or special nuclear material from a nuclear incident, as those terms are defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), if such release is subject to requirements with respect to financial protection established by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under section 170 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2210), or, for the purposes of section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9604) or any other response action, any release of source byproduct, or special nuclear material from any processing site designated under section 102(a)(1) or 302(a) of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7912(a)(1); and (D) the normal application of fertilizer.

      ‘(11) The term ‘substance of concern’ means a chemical substance in quantity and form that is so designated by the Secretary under section 2102(a).

      ‘(12) The term ‘method to reduce the consequences of a terrorist attack’ means a measure used at a chemical facility that reduces or eliminates the potential consequences of a chemical facility terrorist incident, including--

        ‘(A) the elimination or reduction in the amount of a substance of concern possessed or planned to be possessed by an owner or operator of a covered chemical facility through the use of alternate substances, formulations, or processes;

        ‘(B) the modification of pressures, temperatures, or concentrations of a substance of concern; and

        ‘(C) the reduction or elimination of onsite handling of a substance of concern through improvement of inventory control or chemical use efficiency.

‘SEC. 2102. RISK-BASED DESIGNATION AND RANKING OF CHEMICAL FACILITIES.


Full Text of Legislation
 
 
All Actions:

Actions Date
Action Text
6/15/2009
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
6/15/2009
Referred to House Homeland Security
6/15/2009
Referred to House Energy and Commerce
6/16/2009
Committee Hearings Held.
6/23/2009
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
7/13/2009
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 111-205, Part I.
7/13/2009
House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than July 31, 2009.
7/13/2009
Referred sequentially to the House Committee on the Judiciary for a period ending not later than July 31, 2009 for consideration of such provisions of the bill and the amendment as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(k), rule x.
7/31/2009
House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 30, 2009.
7/31/2009
House Committee on Judiciary Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 30, 2009.
9/30/2009
House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 23, 2009.
9/30/2009
House Committee on Judiciary Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 23, 2009.
6/16/2009
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.
10/1/2009
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
10/14/2009
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
10/14/2009
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 10 .
10/23/2009
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 111-205, Part II.
10/23/2009
Committee on Judiciary discharged.
11/3/2009
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 885 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2868 with 1 hour and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The rule provides that in lieu of the amendments in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committees on Homeland Security and Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the report to accompanying this rule shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment.
11/5/2009
Rule H. Res. 885 passed House.
11/5/2009
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 885.
11/5/2009
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2868 with 1 hour and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The rule provides that in lieu of the amendments in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committees on Homeland Security and Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the report to accompanying this rule shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment.
11/5/2009
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 885 and Rule XVIII.
11/5/2009
The Speaker designated the Honorable Jay Inslee to act as Chairman of the Committee.
11/5/2009
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with ninety minutes of general debate on H. R. 2868.
11/5/2009
Ms. Johnson, E. B. moved that the Committee rise.
11/5/2009
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
11/5/2009
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2868 as unfinished business.
11/6/2009
Considered as unfinished business.
11/6/2009
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Thompson (MS) amendment.
11/6/2009
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Thompson (MS) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Barton (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Barton (TX) amendment.
11/6/2009
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Barton (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Barton (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Dent amendment number 4.
11/6/2009
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Dent amendment number 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Dent demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Dent amendment number 5.
11/6/2009
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Dent amendment number 5, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Dent demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schrader amendment.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McCaul amendment.
11/6/2009
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McCaul amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McCaul demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Halvorson amendment.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 885, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Foster amendment.
11/6/2009
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
11/6/2009
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2868.
11/6/2009
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
11/6/2009
Mr. Dent moved to recommit with instructions to Homeland Security.
11/6/2009
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Dent motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to insert a new paragraph which states that in implementing methods to reduce consequences of a terrorist attact on a chemical facility, such implementation must not significantly or demonstrably reduce the operations of the covered chemical facility or result in any net reduction in private sector employment when national unemployment is above 4 percent.
11/6/2009
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
11/6/2009
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 189 - 236 (Roll no. 874).
11/6/2009
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
11/6/2009
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 2868.
11/6/2009
11/6/2009
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 230 - 193 (Roll no. 875).
11/9/2009
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
 
Titles:

Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to extend, modify, and recodify the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to enhance security and protect against acts of terrorism against chemical facilities, and for other purposes.
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance security and protect against acts of terrorism against chemical facilities, to amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to enhance the security of public water systems, and to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to enhance the security of wastewater treatment works, and for other purposes.
Chemical and Water Security Act of 2009
Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009
Drinking Water System Security Act of 2009
Wastewater Treatment Works Security Act of 2009
 
Committee:

Referral, In Committee
Referral, In Committee
Referral, Hearings, In Committee
Referral, Hearings, Markup, In Committee
Referral, Hearings, Markup, Reporting
Referral, In Committee
Referral, Hearings
Referral, Hearings, Markup, Reporting
Referral, Reporting
Referral, Discharged
Referral, In Committee
 
Related Bill Details:

 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
 
|
 
 
|
 
 
Govitâ„¢ 2008