Loading...
Summary
VOTE
VOTING RECORD
US GOVERNMENT
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
username / email
password
remember me
forgot password
New! Login using Facebook
enter your email address used to create the account, and we'll send you a password reset link.
email address
HR 3997
You haven’t voted yet.
Abstain
To permit each current member of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance to serve for 3 terms.
Sponsor:
Adam B. Brady (D) PA
Status:
Active
61 votes
84% No
12 votes
8 COMMENTS
Details
Member Votes
Take Action:
email friends
email congress
link
Popular
Most Votes
Newest
Voted Yes
Voted No
Thumbs Up
Thumbs Down
Democrat
Republican
Independent
Other
Turn profanity filter on
Video Concepts
Posted 16 days ago.
BLOCK
2
1
I don't see the procedures on this matter. How can we trust it enough to let it pass?
REPLY
hide replies
Video Concepts
Posted 13 days ago.
BLOCK
2
0
I lowered my flag 1/2 mast and considered falling on my sword on 11/5/09. The last thing I want is a 2nd term and any chance of a 3rd term.
ladyga913gmail.com
Posted 15 days ago.
BLOCK
1
1
Geez, we only have to put up with a president 2 times, so why would we want anyone else to serve 3?
REPLY
Video Concepts
Posted 10 days ago.
BLOCK
1
1
Actualy, doesn't double digit unemployment, Americans facing home foreclosure and/or on the brink of economic disaster, a stock market teetering on the verge of callapse and a government riddled with corruption deserve more consideration than an attempt to manipulate term limit ruling
REPLY
firefox
Posted 10 days ago.
BLOCK
1
0
red dirt report news ok., click politics click on mystery of obama western journalism,right side of page funding the radical left, prowlingowl.com
REPLY
Sandi_5
Posted 10 days ago.
BLOCK
1
0
NO elected offical should SERVE more than ONCE...as intended...TERM LIMITS!!!
REPLY
Video Concepts
Posted 4 days ago.
BLOCK
0
0
Doesn't the worst economy since the Great Depression, with double digit unemployment, Americans facing home foreclosure and/or on the brink of economic disaster, a stock market teetering on the verge of collapse and a government riddled with corruption deserve more consideration than this attempt to pass an irrlevant House Resolution? Can you assure us that this House Resolution would not unjustly enrich special interests or impose more tax-and-spend legislation to (yet) unborn American citizens? Wouldn't you and your co-workers rather see all unemployed Americans return to work so you and your co-workers can continue to receive your salaries? Whatever happened to priority management within our 111th Congress?
REPLY
sarge1and2
Posted 21 hours ago.
BLOCK
0
0
I think everyone up there needs to leave
REPLY
To post a comment you must
login
or
create an account.
Enter your comments here and speak your mind.
submit
It's easy to vote on Govit
1)
Login with your Facebook Account?
2)
Or,Create a
Govit Account
It's free,easy, and only takes seconds
3)
Already have an account?
Member Login
username / email
password
remember me
cancel
forgot password
about govit
|
contact us
|
terms of use
|
privacy policy
Govit™ 2008